<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: December 2008 IE Vulnerability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://securityblog.verizonbusiness.com/2008/12/17/december-2008-ie-vulnerability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://securityblog.verizonbusiness.com/2008/12/17/december-2008-ie-vulnerability/</link>
	<description>Risk Intelligence from Verizon Business Security Solutions powered by Cybertrust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:27:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Martin</title>
		<link>http://securityblog.verizonbusiness.com/2008/12/17/december-2008-ie-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityblog.verizonbusiness.com/?p=159#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I wonder why Microsoft has started doing these off-cycle patches. Agree that this one doesn&#039;t seem worth the disruption. I remember they were pretty firm about sticking to the once-a-month cycle, stating that widespread exploitation only took place after the bulletin was released. I guess it could be a coincidence that two patches they thought were specially urgent came out so close together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why Microsoft has started doing these off-cycle patches. Agree that this one doesn&#8217;t seem worth the disruption. I remember they were pretty firm about sticking to the once-a-month cycle, stating that widespread exploitation only took place after the bulletin was released. I guess it could be a coincidence that two patches they thought were specially urgent came out so close together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Cooper</title>
		<link>http://securityblog.verizonbusiness.com/2008/12/17/december-2008-ie-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securityblog.verizonbusiness.com/?p=159#comment-103</guid>
		<description>With the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS08-078.mspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bulletin&lt;/a&gt; now published we know that this patch does not replace MS08-073, the Internet Explorer cumulative update from December 9, 2008. This doesn&#039;t alter our opinions.

You should, however, make sure you apply these patches in order just to be safe until Microsoft releases the next IE cumulative update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS08-078.mspx" rel="nofollow">bulletin</a> now published we know that this patch does not replace MS08-073, the Internet Explorer cumulative update from December 9, 2008. This doesn&#8217;t alter our opinions.</p>
<p>You should, however, make sure you apply these patches in order just to be safe until Microsoft releases the next IE cumulative update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
